Elections - Page 6


Suspicious! Milwaukee Voting Wards Reported More Presidential Votes Than Registered Voters

The Milwaukee City Wire published an article with very troubling numbers identified in an analysis of results and Secretary of State files. In a nutshell, “seven City of Milwaukee voting wards reported more 2020 U.S. Presidential election votes than they had registered voters.”

For example, in a data graph from the Milwaukee County Clerk, voting ward 274 claimed it had 640 voters, but a whopping 688 votes for Biden, and 602 votes for Trump. That equates to a turnout percentage of 202%. Eight wards reported turnout percentages of 100% or higher, and over 80 wards reporting between 90-99% of voter turnout.

Wisconsin was one of the states where Trump was leading late on election night and early into Wednesday morning when a sudden and drastic shift occurred. Five of the wards which reported more votes than they had voters registered have very suspicious numbers. The Milwaukee City Wire Reports Joe Biden received “3,768 votes to Trump’s 2,883 – a margin of 885, or eight times what it was in 2016 when Trump earned 1,904 votes to Hillary Clinton’s 2,012.”

The City of Milwaukee reported a record turnout of 84 percent, saying “243,144 of 288,833 registered city voters cast a ballot” which analysts claim is a virtually impossible percentage. Even more suspicious, “Trump received 15 or fewer votes in 16 Milwaukee voting wards including a total 7,389 registered voters. Biden defeated him 5,217 to 151 in them.”

Of the 16 wards, the specific numbers are quite odd: Biden won “588 votes to Trump’s 10 in the 107th voting ward…it’s other two voting wards voted 411 to 14 and 968 to 33 for Biden – a grand total of 1,967 to 57.” In the 114th voting district, “Biden defeated Trump 334-6. In the 117th, in Borchert Field, Biden won 465-9.”

Donald Trump
Donald Trump

Unabashedly Bias: Twitter Flags 3 Trump Tweets In 3 Hours

If you don’t think the media and big tech has a liberal agenda, think again. In only three hours, Twitter has flagged and removed three of the President of the United States’ Tweets. What happened to the first amendment? Just before midnight on election night Twitter flagged President Trump’s tweet giving his opinion on the state of the race. “We are up BIG, but they are trying to STEAL the election. We will never let them do it. Votes cannot be cast after the Polls are closed!” wrote Trump.

As of Wednesday afternoon, Twitter removed three of President Trump’s posts and replaced it with the same message as Tuesday night: “Some or all of the content shared in this Tweet is disputed and might be misleading about an election or other civic process.” Social media users are still able to click “view” in order to see the content that was flagged.

In the first tweet flagged today, President Trump wrote, “Last night I was leading, often solidly, in many key States, in almost all instances Democrat-run & controlled. Then, one by one, they started to magically disappear as surprise ballot dumps were counted. VERY STRANGE, and the ‘pollsters’ got it completely & historically wrong!”

The second censorship occurred shortly after when President Trump retweeted a post made by Matt Walsh of The Daily Wire, commenting, “WHAT IS THIS ALL ABOUT?” Walsh’s tweet was also censored and the page for his initial link has been removed. Walsh tweeted of the censorship, “This is bull****. Twitter censored a tweet where I expressed my opinion about the way the ballots are being counted.”

Walsh’s original tweet questioned the significant and odd change of over 100,000 votes going from Trump to Biden in Michigan, to which he noted, “This is reason enough to go to court. No honest person can look at this and say it’s normal and unconcerning.”  President Trump simply retweeting the comment and asking “what’s this all about” was reason enough to be flagged for Twitter.

Only hours ago, Trump’s third post was flagged by the Twitter police. “They are working hard to make up 500,000 vote advantage in Pennsylvania disappear -ASAP. Likewise, Michigan and others!”

Long Lines Of Voters Wait To Cast Early Voting Ballots In Philadelphia

Stealing Pennsylvania?

Way back there in the midst of the fall 2008 presidential election I had this headline on a column in The American Spectator:

Stealing Pennsylvania: “Massive Fraud”

In which, among other things, I said this, quoting then-Pennsylvania Republican State Chairman Robert Gleason:

“Between March 23rd and October 1st, various groups, including ACORN, submitted over 252,595 registrations to the Philadelphia County Election Board” with 57, 435 rejected for faulty information. “Most of these registrations were submitted by ACORN, and rejected due to fake social security numbers, incorrect dates of birth, clearly fraudulent signatures, addresses that do not exist, and duplicate registrations. In one case, a man was registered to vote more than 15 times since the Primary election.”

In other words, voting fraud in Pennsylvania was out there in the 2008 election cycle.

And here we are again.

Over there in The American Spectator, one George Parry, a Spectator colleague and, to the point an ex-state and federal prosecutor, has a piece out that is headlined – yes, indeed -this:

Stealing Pennsylvania
Unpostmarked mail-in ballots will make the difference, thanks to the Democrat state Supreme Court

Among other things, George notes the recent appearance on Sean Hannity’s TV show of pollster Robert Cahaly of the Trafalgar Group, the polling outfit that correctly called the Trump win in 2016. In discussing 2020, Cahaly said that Trump can win again. But when it comes to Pennsylvania he said that Trump had to win by a big enough margin to overcome voter fraud.

Indeed. George Parry went on to explain Pennsylvania’s problem. Said George:

“Given Pennsylvania’s recently decreed rules for receiving and counting mail-in ballots, there may be no percentage of honest votes large enough to overcome the voter fraud already underway in the Keystone State. These new rules have been put in place by a Democrat majority (Pennsylvania judges are elected) on the state supreme court. In addition to allowing mail-in ballots to be received and counted up to three days after the statutory Election Day deadline, the new judicially conjured rules for processing mail-in ballots can be boiled down to this aphorism: no postmark, no matching signature, no problem!

You read that right. Here in Pennsylvania, our state supreme court has mandated that a mail-in ballot received up to three days after Election Day must be counted and cannot be rejected merely because it is not postmarked by the statutory Election Day deadline or bears a signature that doesn’t match the one on record for the purported voter.

Care to guess how many such unverifiable ballots will mysteriously turn up after Election Day?”

In other words, to beat voter fraud in Pennsylvania, Trump needs a landslide win.

Can he get it?

Possibly. The President has been doing one rally after another here in my home state. The other day he appeared in Butler, which is in Western Pennsylvania. His rally drew a mind-boggling 57,000 people – in the cold:

Trump crowd in Butler, PA
Trump crowd in Butler, PA

I personally have been at three of his recent rallies – two in South Central Pennsylvania (Harrisburg and outside Lancaster in Lititz) and Montoursville (next to Williamsport in North Central Pennsylvania.) All three were filled with tens of thousands of people who were seriously enthusiastic Trump supporters.

Which is to say, these crowds represent precisely the kind of enthusiasm that can carry Pennsylvania. And taking no chances, there is a team of 20 lawyers who are watching very, very carefully – to make sure there is no stealing Pennsylvania

Tony Bobulinski

Podcast: Tony Bobulinski Has The Goods On The Bidens

Jeffrey Lord digs into the Tony Bobulinkski story while the mainstream media continues to ignore it. Earlier this week, a Senate committee was able to verify the materials it has reviewed so far from Tony Bobulinski, a former Hunter Biden business partner. Bobulinski, a retired lieutenant in the U.S. Navy, was the former CEO of SinoHawk Holdings, which he said was the partnership between the CEFC Chairman Ye Jianming and the two Biden family members.


Apple Podcasts | Stitcher | Google Podcasts | RSS | Spotify

Joe Biden

If Elected, A Biden Impeachment and Special Prosecutor Over The NY Post Stories?

Recall.  President Donald Trump was impeached for a phone call to the President of Ukraine in which, falsely claimed Democrats, he asked the Ukrainian leader to take action that would benefit Trump politically.

Now comes the New York Post series on the discovery of Hunter Biden’s laptop – and the reveal that the then-Vice President of the United States was taking action that would benefit his family financially.

Logic would dictate that in following the same rules there should be:

A) a special counsel appointed to investigate the Biden activities for colluding with foreign actors for financial benefit.

B) if Biden is elected – an impeachment hearing and vote should be held.

The chairmen of the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs (Wisconsin’s Ron Johnson) and the Senate’s Committee on Finance (Iowa’s Charles Grassley) have now released an 87-page report titled:

Hunter Biden, Burisma, and Corruption: The Impact on U.S. Government Policy and Related Concerns
Majority Staff Report

The report concludes this:

“The records acquired by the Committees also show that Hunter Biden and his family were involved in a vast financial network that connected them to foreign nationals and foreign governments across the globe. Hunter Biden and Devon Archer, in particular, formed significant and consistent financial relationships with the corrupt oligarch Mykola Zlochevsky during their time working for Burisma, and their firms made millions of dollars from that association while Joe Biden was vice president and the public face of the Obama administration’s Ukraine policy. Rosemont Seneca Thornton, an investment firm co-founded by Hunter Biden, received $3.5 million in a wire transfer from Elena Baturina, who allegedly received illegal construction contracts from her husband, the then-mayor of Moscow. Moreover, Archer’s apparent receipt of money for a car from Kenges Rakishev of Kazakhstan while Vice President Biden was in Kyiv is especially concerning in light of the timing. And finally, Biden and Archer’s work with Chinese nationals connected to the Communist regime illustrate the deep financial connections that accelerated while Joe Biden was vice president and continued after he left office.”

Which is to say, in specific detail, two US Senate committees have issued a report that said the fact that Joe Biden’s son worked:

“….with Chinese nationals connected to the Communist regime illustrate the deep financial connections that accelerated while Joe Biden was vice president and continued after he left office.”

If this had been Donald Trump, the hue and cry for a special prosecutor would have gone up instantly. And at the same time, the demand would be that the President must be impeached.

So. Let’s say for the sake of the argument that the Hate Trump media is right – and Joe Biden wins the election.

The move to have a special prosecutor should begin on the spot because a Biden-run Department of Justice simply could not be trusted to investigate Biden. And once he takes the oath and is President Biden?

The impeachment of Joe Biden should begin on the spot.

1 4 5 6 7 8 31